i9-10900K vs i3-540 - Monster Hunter: World RX 6700 XT - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-540

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
2687 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1224 Pts

Monster Hunter: World

i9-10900K vs i3-540 in Monster Hunter: World using RX 6700 XT - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-540

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.0 FPS
1080p
37.8 FPS
1440p
98.0 FPS
1440p
26.6 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
2160p
12.5 FPS
w1440p
77.0 FPS
w1440p
20.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
207.6 FPS
1080p
68.8 FPS
1440p
154.9 FPS
1440p
50.7 FPS
2160p
81.4 FPS
2160p
26.2 FPS
w1440p
126.4 FPS
w1440p
41.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
276.1 FPS
1080p
99.7 FPS
1440p
211.8 FPS
1440p
74.8 FPS
2160p
116.8 FPS
2160p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
175.7 FPS
w1440p
61.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
413.3 FPS
1080p
161.6 FPS
1440p
325.6 FPS
1440p
123.1 FPS
2160p
187.6 FPS
2160p
67.3 FPS
w1440p
274.4 FPS
w1440p
101.7 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i9-10900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-540
  • The i3-540 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-540 specifications

i9-10900K vs i3-540 Architecture

i9-10900K i3-540
CodenameComet LakeClarkdale
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i3 (Clarkdale)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSLBX7SLBLR
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Jan 2010

i9-10900K vs i3-540 Cache

i9-10900K i3-540
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i3-540 Cores

i9-10900K i3-540
# of Cores102
# of Threads204
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630Intel HD
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i3-540 Features

i9-10900K i3-540
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 Intel 64 HTT VT-x XD-Bit

i9-10900K vs i3-540 Notes

i9-10900K i3-540

i9-10900K vs i3-540 Performance

i9-10900K i3-540
Base Clock100 MHz133 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.066 GHz
Multiplier37.0x23.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W73 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.4 V

i9-10900K vs i3-540 Physical

i9-10900K i3-540
Die Sizeunknown81 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA10
Process Size14 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1156
Transistorsunknown382 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs i3-540 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments