Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 4060 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Core2 Duo E7200 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Multi-Thread Performance

1633 Pts
18511 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1049 Pts
1995 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 4060 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Core2 Duo E7200 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.7 FPS
1080p
36.1 FPS
1440p
13.6 FPS
1440p
31.4 FPS
2160p
10.9 FPS
2160p
25.1 FPS
w1440p
13.1 FPS
w1440p
30.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.0 FPS
1080p
66.1 FPS
1440p
28.2 FPS
1440p
58.6 FPS
2160p
23.2 FPS
2160p
48.2 FPS
w1440p
27.3 FPS
w1440p
56.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.3 FPS
1080p
96.1 FPS
1440p
42.8 FPS
1440p
85.7 FPS
2160p
35.5 FPS
2160p
71.3 FPS
w1440p
41.5 FPS
w1440p
83.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
80.9 FPS
1080p
156.0 FPS
1440p
72.0 FPS
1440p
140.1 FPS
2160p
60.2 FPS
2160p
117.6 FPS
w1440p
69.9 FPS
w1440p
135.9 FPS
Core2 Duo E7200
  • The Core2 Duo E7200 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X specifications

Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Architecture

Core2 Duo E7200 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
CodenameWolfdaleZen
GenerationCore 2 Duo (Wolfdale)Ryzen Threadripper (Zen)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Part#SLAPCYD192XA8UC9AE
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive
ReleasedApr 2008Aug 2017

Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Cache

Core2 Duo E7200 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L23MB (shared)512K (per core)

Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Cores

Core2 Duo E7200 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
# of Cores212
# of Threads224
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Features

Core2 Duo E7200 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4 Intel 64 C1E C2E EISTMMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost XFR

Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Performance

Core2 Duo E7200 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Base Clock266 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.533 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier9.5x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W180 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.2 GHz
Voltage1.11 Vvariable

Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Physical

Core2 Duo E7200 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Die Size82 mm²213 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA6FCLGA-4094
Process Size45 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 775AMD Socket SP3r2
Transistors228 million9600 million
tCaseMax74°Cunknown

Compare Core2 Duo E7200 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
D
dillsonore 7 years ago
Overclocking Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7200I have this fairly old and crappy processor from the late 2000's that brings down a lot of aspects of my pc. I was wondering if overclocking would bring any huge issues for my pc in the long run. I'm okay with any potential damages to my PC, but I was wondering how high the risk would possibly be to overclock to 3GHz. This is also a fairly old system, which is a modified Vostro 410. My specs:GPU : GeForce GTX 750 TiProcessor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7200 @ 2.53GhzMemory: 4 GB Ram
0 0
T
tamarinpersevere 7 years ago
The maximum CPU I see for that at userbenchmark.com is a Q9550.http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3011155 At Delidded.com they show a Xeon X5450 works. usually the Q9550, but no Q9650 means a problem with E0 stepping CPUs.https://www.delidded.com/lga-771-to-775-adapter/3/#dellThe easy option is the latest BIOS from Dell and a Q9550.The cheapest would be to tapemod a 1066fsb CPU to 1333fsb. Q6600 SLACR goes 3.0GHz. E7500 ( both slower than Q9550) The best performance would be a Xeon swap but only the C0 versions. X5460 SLANP 3.17GHz, X5450 SLASB, E5450 SLANQhttps://www.delidded.com/lga-771-775-cpus/?filter=socket-lga-771,series-xeon,fsb-1333,node-45nm,stepping-c0
0 0
K
kosherfinnegan 10 years ago
upgraded e7200 core 2 duo to a q9550i just upgraded and now my system just beeps no monitor nothing?
0 0
E
embargoplay 10 years ago
Tell me your system. I know those two processors are on the same socket. Gimme the Specs of your System
0 0