Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 4080 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Core2 Duo E7200 FX-6300 Six-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

1633 Pts
6385 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1049 Pts
1407 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 4080 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Core2 Duo E7200 FX-6300 Six-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
31.0 FPS
1080p
38.6 FPS
1440p
27.2 FPS
1440p
33.9 FPS
2160p
21.5 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
32.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.9 FPS
1080p
70.0 FPS
1440p
51.7 FPS
1440p
62.6 FPS
2160p
42.1 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
w1440p
60.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
84.8 FPS
1080p
101.4 FPS
1440p
76.2 FPS
1440p
91.3 FPS
2160p
62.8 FPS
2160p
75.1 FPS
w1440p
73.7 FPS
w1440p
88.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
138.7 FPS
1080p
164.2 FPS
1440p
125.2 FPS
1440p
148.6 FPS
2160p
104.1 FPS
2160p
123.4 FPS
w1440p
121.3 FPS
w1440p
143.5 FPS
Core2 Duo E7200
    FX-6300 Six-Core

      Compare Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core specifications

      Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Architecture

      Core2 Duo E7200 FX-6300 Six-Core

      Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Cache

      Core2 Duo E7200 FX-6300 Six-Core

      Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Cores

      Core2 Duo E7200 FX-6300 Six-Core

      Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Features

      Core2 Duo E7200 FX-6300 Six-Core

      Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Performance

      Core2 Duo E7200 FX-6300 Six-Core

      Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core Physical

      Core2 Duo E7200 FX-6300 Six-Core

      Compare Core2 Duo E7200 vs FX-6300 Six-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments
      C
      crapulousmixture 7 years ago
      Overclocking Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7200I have this fairly old and crappy processor from the late 2000's that brings down a lot of aspects of my pc. I was wondering if overclocking would bring any huge issues for my pc in the long run. I'm okay with any potential damages to my PC, but I was wondering how high the risk would possibly be to overclock to 3GHz. This is also a fairly old system, which is a modified Vostro 410. My specs:GPU : GeForce GTX 750 TiProcessor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7200 @ 2.53GhzMemory: 4 GB Ram
      0 0
      R
      romenike 7 years ago
      The maximum CPU I see for that at userbenchmark.com is a Q9550.http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/3011155 At Delidded.com they show a Xeon X5450 works. usually the Q9550, but no Q9650 means a problem with E0 stepping CPUs.https://www.delidded.com/lga-771-to-775-adapter/3/#dellThe easy option is the latest BIOS from Dell and a Q9550.The cheapest would be to tapemod a 1066fsb CPU to 1333fsb. Q6600 SLACR goes 3.0GHz. E7500 ( both slower than Q9550) The best performance would be a Xeon swap but only the C0 versions. X5460 SLANP 3.17GHz, X5450 SLASB, E5450 SLANQhttps://www.delidded.com/lga-771-775-cpus/?filter=socket-lga-771,series-xeon,fsb-1333,node-45nm,stepping-c0
      0 0
      E
      endnotetokahee 11 years ago
      upgraded e7200 core 2 duo to a q9550i just upgraded and now my system just beeps no monitor nothing?
      0 0
      F
      frostinggambler 11 years ago
      Tell me your system. I know those two processors are on the same socket. Gimme the Specs of your System
      0 0