i9-14900K vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-14900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

41458 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

5619 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i9-14900K vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-14900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.8 FPS
1080p
12.3 FPS
1440p
12.3 FPS
1440p
10.7 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
2160p
8.5 FPS
w1440p
11.8 FPS
w1440p
10.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.4 FPS
1080p
25.8 FPS
1440p
25.8 FPS
1440p
22.8 FPS
2160p
20.9 FPS
2160p
18.6 FPS
w1440p
24.9 FPS
w1440p
22.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.0 FPS
1080p
39.3 FPS
1440p
39.3 FPS
1440p
35.0 FPS
2160p
32.2 FPS
2160p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
w1440p
33.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
77.2 FPS
1080p
66.4 FPS
1440p
66.4 FPS
1440p
59.3 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
2160p
49.0 FPS
w1440p
64.2 FPS
w1440p
57.4 FPS
i9-14900K
    i3-10100
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-14900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-14900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-14900K i3-10100

    i9-14900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-14900K i3-10100

    i9-14900K vs i3-10100 Core Config

    i9-14900K i3-10100

    i9-14900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-14900K i3-10100
    Frequency3.2 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-14900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-14900K i3-10100

    i9-14900K vs i3-10100 Processor

    i9-14900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-14900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments