i9-13900K vs i5-12400 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
3240 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.7 FPS
1080p
13.4 FPS
1440p
12.3 FPS
1440p
11.7 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
2160p
9.3 FPS
w1440p
11.8 FPS
w1440p
11.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.2 FPS
1080p
27.8 FPS
1440p
25.8 FPS
1440p
24.7 FPS
2160p
20.9 FPS
2160p
20.2 FPS
w1440p
24.9 FPS
w1440p
23.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.7 FPS
1080p
42.3 FPS
1440p
39.3 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
2160p
32.2 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
w1440p
36.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.7 FPS
1080p
71.2 FPS
1440p
66.4 FPS
1440p
63.7 FPS
2160p
54.7 FPS
2160p
52.8 FPS
w1440p
64.2 FPS
w1440p
61.5 FPS
i9-13900K
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-13900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-13900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-13900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i9-13900K vs i5-12400 specifications

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i9-13900K i5-12400
ChipsetsZ690, Z790Z690, H670, B660, H610
CodenameRaptor Lake-SAlder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed5600 MT/s4800 MT/s
ECC MemoryYesNo
GenerationCore i9 (Raptor Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP$589$199
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRMBHSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateSep 27th, 2022Jan 4th, 2022

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Cache

i9-13900K i5-12400
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L336MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Cores

i9-13900K i5-12400
# of Cores246
# of Threads3212
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Performance

i9-13900K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier30.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
PL1253 W65W
PL2253 W117W
PL2 Tau LimitUnlimited28 seconds
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.8 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-13900K vs i5-12400 Physical

i9-13900K i5-12400
Die Size257 mm²163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i9-13900K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments