i9-12900K vs i3-10300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-12900K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

28791 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3903 Pts
2690 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i9-12900K vs i3-10300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-12900K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
17.1 FPS
1080p
15.1 FPS
1440p
14.6 FPS
1440p
13.3 FPS
2160p
11.4 FPS
2160p
10.3 FPS
w1440p
13.9 FPS
w1440p
12.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.5 FPS
1080p
30.9 FPS
1440p
30.0 FPS
1440p
27.7 FPS
2160p
24.2 FPS
2160p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.9 FPS
1080p
46.8 FPS
1440p
45.5 FPS
1440p
42.0 FPS
2160p
36.9 FPS
2160p
33.9 FPS
w1440p
43.6 FPS
w1440p
40.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
86.7 FPS
1080p
78.4 FPS
1440p
76.3 FPS
1440p
70.8 FPS
2160p
62.4 FPS
2160p
57.4 FPS
w1440p
73.3 FPS
w1440p
67.7 FPS
i9-12900K
    i3-10300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-12900K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i9-12900K i3-10300

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i9-12900K i3-10300

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i9-12900K i3-10300

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i9-12900K i3-10300
    Frequency3.2 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-12900K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i9-12900K i3-10300

    Compare i9-12900K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments