i9-10900K vs i3-10300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RX 5300M - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2690 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i9-10900K vs i3-10300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RX 5300M - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
10.4 FPS
1080p
9.6 FPS
1440p
9.2 FPS
1440p
8.5 FPS
2160p
7.3 FPS
2160p
6.7 FPS
w1440p
8.8 FPS
w1440p
8.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
22.3 FPS
1080p
20.8 FPS
1440p
20.0 FPS
1440p
18.6 FPS
2160p
16.3 FPS
2160p
15.1 FPS
w1440p
19.2 FPS
w1440p
17.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.1 FPS
1080p
31.9 FPS
1440p
30.8 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
2160p
25.3 FPS
2160p
23.5 FPS
w1440p
29.6 FPS
w1440p
27.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.9 FPS
1080p
54.2 FPS
1440p
52.3 FPS
1440p
49.0 FPS
2160p
43.2 FPS
2160p
40.2 FPS
w1440p
50.5 FPS
w1440p
47.1 FPS
i9-10900K
    i3-10300
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10300 specifications

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Cache

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Cores

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Features

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Notes

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Performance

    i9-10900K i3-10300
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-10900K vs i3-10300 Physical

    i9-10900K i3-10300

    Compare i9-10900K vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments