i7-10700K vs i7-9700F - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-10700K i7-9700F

Multi-Thread Performance

18919 Pts
17589 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2991 Pts
2834 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i7-10700K vs i7-9700F in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-10700K i7-9700F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
13.5 FPS
1080p
13.2 FPS
1440p
11.8 FPS
1440p
11.6 FPS
2160p
9.3 FPS
2160p
9.2 FPS
w1440p
11.3 FPS
w1440p
11.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
28.0 FPS
1080p
27.5 FPS
1440p
24.9 FPS
1440p
24.5 FPS
2160p
20.2 FPS
2160p
20.0 FPS
w1440p
24.0 FPS
w1440p
23.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.6 FPS
1080p
41.8 FPS
1440p
38.0 FPS
1440p
37.4 FPS
2160p
31.1 FPS
2160p
30.8 FPS
w1440p
36.6 FPS
w1440p
36.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.6 FPS
1080p
70.3 FPS
1440p
64.2 FPS
1440p
63.3 FPS
2160p
52.8 FPS
2160p
52.3 FPS
w1440p
62.0 FPS
w1440p
61.1 FPS
i7-10700K
  • The i7-10700K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i7-10700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-10700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-10700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i7-10700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i7-9700F
  • The i7-9700F is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i7-9700F has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i7-10700K vs i7-9700F specifications

i7-10700K vs i7-9700F Architecture

i7-10700K i7-9700F
CodenameComet LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i7 (Comet Lake)Core i7 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Apr 2019

i7-10700K vs i7-9700F Cache

i7-10700K i7-9700F
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i7-10700K vs i7-9700F Cores

i7-10700K i7-9700F
# of Cores88
# of Threads168
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i7-10700K vs i7-9700F Features

i7-10700K i7-9700F

i7-10700K vs i7-9700F Notes

i7-10700K i7-9700F

i7-10700K vs i7-9700F Performance

i7-10700K i7-9700F
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.8 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier38.0x30.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzup to 4.7 GHz
Voltagevariableunknown

i7-10700K vs i7-9700F Physical

i7-10700K i7-9700F
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA14C
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i7-10700K vs i7-9700F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments