i5-14600K vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-14600K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-14600K vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-14600K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
24.9 FPS
1080p
21.3 FPS
1440p
20.0 FPS
1440p
18.7 FPS
2160p
15.8 FPS
2160p
14.8 FPS
w1440p
19.1 FPS
w1440p
17.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.9 FPS
1080p
41.8 FPS
1440p
39.6 FPS
1440p
37.3 FPS
2160p
32.2 FPS
2160p
30.4 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
w1440p
35.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.9 FPS
1080p
62.3 FPS
1440p
59.1 FPS
1440p
55.9 FPS
2160p
48.6 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
w1440p
56.9 FPS
w1440p
53.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
116.9 FPS
1080p
103.3 FPS
1440p
98.2 FPS
1440p
93.1 FPS
2160p
81.3 FPS
2160p
77.2 FPS
w1440p
94.7 FPS
w1440p
89.9 FPS
i5-14600K
    i3-10100
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i5-14600K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i5-14600K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i5-14600K i3-10100

    i5-14600K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i5-14600K i3-10100

    i5-14600K vs i3-10100 Core Config

    i5-14600K i3-10100

    i5-14600K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i5-14600K i3-10100
    Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i5-14600K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i5-14600K i3-10100

    i5-14600K vs i3-10100 Processor

    i5-14600K i3-10100

    Compare i5-14600K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments