i5-13600K vs i5-10600K - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-13600K i5-10600K

Multi-Thread Performance

21168 Pts
14000 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4308 Pts
2850 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-13600K vs i5-10600K in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-13600K i5-10600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
21.6 FPS
1080p
19.8 FPS
1440p
18.2 FPS
1440p
17.2 FPS
2160p
14.4 FPS
2160p
13.6 FPS
w1440p
17.4 FPS
w1440p
16.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.3 FPS
1080p
39.2 FPS
1440p
36.4 FPS
1440p
34.7 FPS
2160p
29.7 FPS
2160p
28.2 FPS
w1440p
35.0 FPS
w1440p
33.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
63.0 FPS
1080p
58.6 FPS
1440p
54.7 FPS
1440p
52.1 FPS
2160p
44.9 FPS
2160p
42.8 FPS
w1440p
52.6 FPS
w1440p
50.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
104.4 FPS
1080p
97.5 FPS
1440p
91.1 FPS
1440p
87.1 FPS
2160p
75.5 FPS
2160p
72.0 FPS
w1440p
87.9 FPS
w1440p
84.2 FPS
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-13600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i5-10600K
  • The i5-10600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10600K is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-10600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-13600K vs i5-10600K specifications

i5-13600K vs i5-10600K Architecture

i5-13600K i5-10600K
CodenameRaptor Lake-SComet Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Raptor Lake)Core i5 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRMBDunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-13600K vs i5-10600K Cache

i5-13600K i5-10600K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L324MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i5-13600K vs i5-10600K Cores

i5-13600K i5-10600K
# of Cores146
# of Threads2012
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-13600K vs i5-10600K Performance

i5-13600K i5-10600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier35.0x41.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.1 GHzup to 4.8 GHz

i5-13600K vs i5-10600K Physical

i5-13600K i5-10600K
Die Size257 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-13600K vs i5-10600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments