i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Ryzen 5 2600

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
13503 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
2008 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 2600

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
20.0 FPS
1080p
16.1 FPS
1440p
17.5 FPS
1440p
14.1 FPS
2160p
13.8 FPS
2160p
11.1 FPS
w1440p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
13.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
39.6 FPS
1080p
32.7 FPS
1440p
35.2 FPS
1440p
29.1 FPS
2160p
28.6 FPS
2160p
23.6 FPS
w1440p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
28.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.1 FPS
1080p
49.3 FPS
1440p
52.9 FPS
1440p
44.1 FPS
2160p
43.4 FPS
2160p
36.1 FPS
w1440p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
42.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.2 FPS
1080p
82.6 FPS
1440p
88.3 FPS
1440p
74.2 FPS
2160p
72.9 FPS
2160p
61.1 FPS
w1440p
85.0 FPS
w1440p
71.6 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen 5 2600
  • The Ryzen 5 2600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen 5 2600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 specifications

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Architecture

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 2600
CodenameAlder Lake-SZen
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Pinnacle Ridge))
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL4V SRL5YYD2600BBM6IAF
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cache

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 2600
Cache L180K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Cores

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 2600
# of Cores66
# of Threads1212
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 2600
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier25.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 3.9 GHz

i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 Physical

i5-12400 Ryzen 5 2600
Die Size163 mm²192 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA16AµOPGA-1331
Process Size10 nm12 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM4

Compare i5-12400 vs Ryzen 5 2600 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments