i5-11600K vs i3-2100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 448SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K i3-2100

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
3687 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
1585 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-11600K vs i3-2100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 448SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K i3-2100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
26.5 FPS
1080p
10.5 FPS
1440p
23.2 FPS
1440p
9.2 FPS
2160p
18.0 FPS
2160p
7.1 FPS
w1440p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
8.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
50.6 FPS
1080p
22.5 FPS
1440p
45.0 FPS
1440p
20.0 FPS
2160p
36.1 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
w1440p
43.2 FPS
w1440p
19.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
74.6 FPS
1080p
34.4 FPS
1440p
66.9 FPS
1440p
30.8 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
64.2 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
122.7 FPS
1080p
58.3 FPS
1440p
110.5 FPS
1440p
52.3 FPS
2160p
90.3 FPS
2160p
42.2 FPS
w1440p
106.3 FPS
w1440p
50.0 FPS
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-11600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-2100
  • The i3-2100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-11600K vs i3-2100 specifications

i5-11600K vs i3-2100 Architecture

i5-11600K i3-2100
CodenameRocket LakeSandy Bridge
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Core i3 (Sandy Bridge)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownSR05C
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Feb 2011

i5-11600K vs i3-2100 Cache

i5-11600K i3-2100
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)3MB (shared)

i5-11600K vs i3-2100 Cores

i5-11600K i3-2100
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750Intel HD 2000
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11600K vs i3-2100 Features

i5-11600K i3-2100
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4.2 Intel 64 SMT EIST HTT XD-Bit VT-x TXT

i5-11600K vs i3-2100 Notes

i5-11600K i3-2100

i5-11600K vs i3-2100 Performance

i5-11600K i3-2100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier39.0x31.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzN/A
Voltagevariableunknown

i5-11600K vs i3-2100 Physical

i5-11600K i3-2100
Die Sizeunknown131 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA10
Process Size14 nm32 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1155
Transistorsunknown504 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-11600K vs i3-2100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments