i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
1848 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
1046 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
63.2 FPS
1080p
24.1 FPS
1440p
55.5 FPS
1440p
21.2 FPS
2160p
43.7 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
53.1 FPS
w1440p
20.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
106.8 FPS
1080p
46.5 FPS
1440p
95.6 FPS
1440p
41.6 FPS
2160p
77.9 FPS
2160p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
92.1 FPS
w1440p
39.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
150.5 FPS
1080p
69.0 FPS
1440p
135.7 FPS
1440p
62.0 FPS
2160p
112.1 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
131.0 FPS
w1440p
59.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
237.7 FPS
1080p
113.9 FPS
1440p
216.0 FPS
1440p
102.9 FPS
2160p
180.5 FPS
2160p
85.0 FPS
w1440p
209.0 FPS
w1440p
99.0 FPS
i5-11600K
  • The i5-11600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-11600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-11600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-11600K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-11600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X2 255
  • The Athlon II X2 255 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 specifications

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 Architecture

i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255
CodenameRocket LakeRegor
GenerationCore i5 (Rocket Lake-S) Athlon II X2 (Regor)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX255OCK23GQ
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Jan 2010

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 Cache

i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255
Cache L164K (per core)128K
Cache L2256K (per core)1MB

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 Cores

i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 Features

i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 Notes

i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 Performance

i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Multiplier39.0x15.5x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.9 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.15 V

i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 Physical

i5-11600K Athlon II X2 255
Die Sizeunknown117 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown410 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-11600K vs Athlon II X2 255 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments