i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
2311 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
921 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
15.8 FPS
1080p
6.0 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
1440p
5.2 FPS
2160p
10.8 FPS
2160p
4.1 FPS
w1440p
13.2 FPS
w1440p
5.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.2 FPS
1080p
13.7 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
1440p
12.0 FPS
2160p
23.0 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
w1440p
27.5 FPS
w1440p
11.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.6 FPS
1080p
21.3 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
1440p
18.9 FPS
2160p
35.3 FPS
2160p
15.4 FPS
w1440p
41.8 FPS
w1440p
18.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
81.3 FPS
1080p
36.7 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
1440p
32.5 FPS
2160p
59.7 FPS
2160p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
70.3 FPS
w1440p
31.5 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i5-10400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 425
  • The Athlon II X3 425 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 specifications

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 Architecture

i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425
CodenameComet LakeRana
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownADX425WFK32GIADX425WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedMay 2020Oct 2009

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 Cache

i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 Cores

i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425
# of Cores63
# of Threads123
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 Features

i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 Notes

i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 Performance

i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Multiplier29.0x13.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 Physical

i5-10400 Athlon II X3 425
Die Sizeunknown169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1200µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown300 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i5-10400 vs Athlon II X3 425 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments