i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9350KF Phenom II X6 1075T

Multi-Thread Performance

10458 Pts
5344 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2562 Pts
1193 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9350KF Phenom II X6 1075T

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
34.5 FPS
1080p
18.9 FPS
1440p
30.4 FPS
1440p
16.7 FPS
2160p
25.5 FPS
2160p
14.0 FPS
w1440p
30.0 FPS
w1440p
16.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
63.5 FPS
1080p
37.7 FPS
1440p
56.9 FPS
1440p
33.8 FPS
2160p
48.9 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
w1440p
56.3 FPS
w1440p
33.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
92.6 FPS
1080p
56.4 FPS
1440p
83.5 FPS
1440p
50.9 FPS
2160p
72.3 FPS
2160p
43.9 FPS
w1440p
82.6 FPS
w1440p
50.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
150.7 FPS
1080p
93.9 FPS
1440p
136.6 FPS
1440p
85.0 FPS
2160p
119.1 FPS
2160p
73.8 FPS
w1440p
135.2 FPS
w1440p
83.8 FPS
i3-9350KF
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9350KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9350KF has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The i3-9350KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X6 1075T
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T specifications

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T Architecture

i3-9350KF Phenom II X6 1075T
CodenameCoffee LakeThuban
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X6 (Thuban)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHDT75TFBK6DGRHDT75TFBGRBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Sep 2010

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T Cache

i3-9350KF Phenom II X6 1075T
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T Cores

i3-9350KF Phenom II X6 1075T
# of Cores46
# of Threads46
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T Performance

i3-9350KF Phenom II X6 1075T
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier40.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP91 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzup to 3.5 GHz
Voltagevariable1.475 V

i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T Physical

i3-9350KF Phenom II X6 1075T
Die Sizeunknown346 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown904 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9350KF vs Phenom II X6 1075T in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments