i3-9100 vs i3-10300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

9095 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2411 Pts
2690 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-9100 vs i3-10300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.5 FPS
1080p
15.1 FPS
1440p
12.7 FPS
1440p
13.3 FPS
2160p
9.9 FPS
2160p
10.3 FPS
w1440p
12.1 FPS
w1440p
12.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
29.8 FPS
1080p
30.9 FPS
1440p
26.6 FPS
1440p
27.7 FPS
2160p
21.3 FPS
2160p
22.1 FPS
w1440p
25.5 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.2 FPS
1080p
46.8 FPS
1440p
40.4 FPS
1440p
42.0 FPS
2160p
32.7 FPS
2160p
33.9 FPS
w1440p
38.8 FPS
w1440p
40.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.9 FPS
1080p
78.4 FPS
1440p
68.2 FPS
1440p
70.8 FPS
2160p
55.6 FPS
2160p
57.4 FPS
w1440p
65.5 FPS
w1440p
67.7 FPS
i3-9100
  • The i3-9100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-9100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-9100 i3-10300

i3-9100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-9100 i3-10300

i3-9100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-9100 i3-10300

i3-9100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-9100 i3-10300
Frequency3.7 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP65 W65 W

i3-9100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-9100 i3-10300

Compare i3-9100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments