i3-7300 vs i5-10400 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7300 i5-10400

Multi-Thread Performance

6436 Pts
12716 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2317 Pts
2609 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-7300 vs i5-10400 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7300 i5-10400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
10.2 FPS
1080p
13.1 FPS
1440p
9.0 FPS
1440p
11.5 FPS
2160p
7.1 FPS
2160p
9.1 FPS
w1440p
8.6 FPS
w1440p
11.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
21.9 FPS
1080p
27.3 FPS
1440p
19.6 FPS
1440p
24.3 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
2160p
19.8 FPS
w1440p
18.8 FPS
w1440p
23.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
33.6 FPS
1080p
41.5 FPS
1440p
30.2 FPS
1440p
37.2 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
2160p
30.5 FPS
w1440p
29.1 FPS
w1440p
35.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.0 FPS
1080p
69.9 FPS
1440p
51.4 FPS
1440p
62.9 FPS
2160p
42.2 FPS
2160p
51.9 FPS
w1440p
49.5 FPS
w1440p
60.6 FPS
i3-7300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-10400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-10400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-7300 vs i5-10400 specifications

i3-7300 vs i5-10400 Architecture

i3-7300 i5-10400
CodenameKaby LakeComet Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i5 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#SR359unknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedJan 2017May 2020

i3-7300 vs i5-10400 Cache

i3-7300 i5-10400
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-7300 vs i5-10400 Cores

i3-7300 i5-10400
# of Cores26
# of Threads412
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD Graphics 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7300 vs i5-10400 Features

i3-7300 i5-10400
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x VT-d HTT AES-NI TSX TXT CLMUL FMA3 F16C BMI1 BMI2 Boost 2.0

i3-7300 vs i5-10400 Performance

i3-7300 i5-10400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplier40.0x29.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP51 W65 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.3 GHz
Voltageunknownvariable

i3-7300 vs i5-10400 Physical

i3-7300 i5-10400
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1200
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7300 vs i5-10400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments