i3-12300 vs i3-10300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2690 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12300 vs i3-10300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.6 FPS
1080p
18.9 FPS
1440p
17.1 FPS
1440p
16.5 FPS
2160p
13.6 FPS
2160p
13.1 FPS
w1440p
16.4 FPS
w1440p
15.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.9 FPS
1080p
37.7 FPS
1440p
34.5 FPS
1440p
33.4 FPS
2160p
28.2 FPS
2160p
27.3 FPS
w1440p
33.3 FPS
w1440p
32.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.1 FPS
1080p
56.4 FPS
1440p
51.9 FPS
1440p
50.4 FPS
2160p
42.8 FPS
2160p
41.5 FPS
w1440p
50.1 FPS
w1440p
48.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.7 FPS
1080p
93.9 FPS
1440p
86.7 FPS
1440p
84.2 FPS
2160p
72.0 FPS
2160p
69.9 FPS
w1440p
83.8 FPS
w1440p
81.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10300

i3-12300 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10300

i3-12300 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10300

i3-12300 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10300
Frequency3.5 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10300

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments