i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - Microsoft Flight Simulator RX 540 Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
18511 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1995 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RX 540 Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
3.6 FPS
1080p
3.1 FPS
1440p
3.0 FPS
1440p
2.6 FPS
2160p
2.3 FPS
2160p
2.1 FPS
w1440p
2.8 FPS
w1440p
2.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
8.7 FPS
1080p
7.6 FPS
1440p
7.4 FPS
1440p
6.5 FPS
2160p
5.8 FPS
2160p
5.3 FPS
w1440p
6.9 FPS
w1440p
6.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
13.7 FPS
1080p
12.1 FPS
1440p
11.7 FPS
1440p
10.3 FPS
2160p
9.3 FPS
2160p
8.6 FPS
w1440p
11.0 FPS
w1440p
10.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
23.9 FPS
1080p
21.0 FPS
1440p
20.4 FPS
1440p
18.1 FPS
2160p
16.3 FPS
2160p
15.0 FPS
w1440p
19.3 FPS
w1440p
17.5 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X specifications

i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Architecture

i3-12300 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
CodenameAlder Lake-SZen
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen Threadripper (Zen)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL61YD192XA8UC9AE
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Cache

i3-12300 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cache L180K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)32MB

i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Cores

i3-12300 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
# of Cores412
# of Threads824
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Performance

i3-12300 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier35.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W180 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.2 GHz

i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Physical

i3-12300 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Die Size163 mm²213 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA16AFCLGA-4094
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket SP3r2

Compare i3-12300 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments