i3-12100 vs i9-10900K - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i9-10900K

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
22851 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
3099 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i9-10900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.2 FPS
1080p
20.3 FPS
1440p
16.8 FPS
1440p
17.7 FPS
2160p
13.3 FPS
2160p
14.0 FPS
w1440p
16.1 FPS
w1440p
17.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.2 FPS
1080p
40.1 FPS
1440p
34.0 FPS
1440p
35.6 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
w1440p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
34.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.1 FPS
1080p
59.9 FPS
1440p
51.1 FPS
1440p
53.4 FPS
2160p
42.0 FPS
2160p
43.9 FPS
w1440p
49.3 FPS
w1440p
51.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
95.1 FPS
1080p
99.4 FPS
1440p
85.5 FPS
1440p
89.1 FPS
2160p
70.8 FPS
2160p
73.8 FPS
w1440p
82.6 FPS
w1440p
86.3 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12100 vs i9-10900K specifications

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Architecture

i3-12100 i9-10900K
CodenameAlder Lake-SComet Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Cache

i3-12100 i9-10900K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Cores

i3-12100 i9-10900K
# of Cores410
# of Threads820
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Performance

i3-12100 i9-10900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Physical

i3-12100 i9-10900K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200

Compare i3-12100 vs i9-10900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments