i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
36.6 FPS
1080p
35.5 FPS
1440p
32.3 FPS
1440p
31.4 FPS
2160p
27.1 FPS
2160p
26.3 FPS
w1440p
31.8 FPS
w1440p
30.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
66.9 FPS
1080p
65.1 FPS
1440p
60.0 FPS
1440p
58.6 FPS
2160p
51.5 FPS
2160p
50.2 FPS
w1440p
59.2 FPS
w1440p
57.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
97.1 FPS
1080p
94.8 FPS
1440p
87.7 FPS
1440p
85.7 FPS
2160p
76.0 FPS
2160p
74.1 FPS
w1440p
86.6 FPS
w1440p
84.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
157.7 FPS
1080p
154.0 FPS
1440p
143.2 FPS
1440p
140.1 FPS
2160p
124.9 FPS
2160p
122.0 FPS
w1440p
141.5 FPS
w1440p
138.3 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments