i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 - Microsoft Flight Simulator R9 295X2 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3500

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
1655 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2820 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using R9 295X2 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3500

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.2 FPS
1080p
31.9 FPS
1440p
26.6 FPS
1440p
26.4 FPS
2160p
21.0 FPS
2160p
20.9 FPS
w1440p
25.4 FPS
w1440p
25.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.9 FPS
1080p
59.4 FPS
1440p
50.7 FPS
1440p
50.4 FPS
2160p
41.3 FPS
2160p
41.1 FPS
w1440p
48.7 FPS
w1440p
48.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
87.5 FPS
1080p
86.9 FPS
1440p
74.8 FPS
1440p
74.4 FPS
2160p
61.6 FPS
2160p
61.3 FPS
w1440p
72.0 FPS
w1440p
71.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
142.8 FPS
1080p
141.8 FPS
1440p
123.1 FPS
1440p
122.3 FPS
2160p
102.1 FPS
2160p
101.7 FPS
w1440p
118.7 FPS
w1440p
118.3 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
Ryzen 5 3500
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3500 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 specifications

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Architecture

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3500
CodenameAlder Lake-SZen 2
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen 5 (Zen 2)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Cache

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3500
Cache L180K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)32MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Cores

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3500
# of Cores46
# of Threads812
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Performance

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3500
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier33.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.2 GHz

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 Physical

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3500
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelTSMC
PackageFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm7 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM4

Compare i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3500 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments