i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3400G

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
9984 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2067 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3400G

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
19.2 FPS
1080p
15.5 FPS
1440p
16.8 FPS
1440p
13.5 FPS
2160p
13.3 FPS
2160p
10.7 FPS
w1440p
16.1 FPS
w1440p
12.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.2 FPS
1080p
31.6 FPS
1440p
34.0 FPS
1440p
28.0 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
2160p
22.8 FPS
w1440p
32.7 FPS
w1440p
26.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.1 FPS
1080p
47.8 FPS
1440p
51.1 FPS
1440p
42.6 FPS
2160p
42.0 FPS
2160p
35.0 FPS
w1440p
49.3 FPS
w1440p
41.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
95.1 FPS
1080p
80.1 FPS
1440p
85.5 FPS
1440p
71.6 FPS
2160p
70.8 FPS
2160p
59.3 FPS
w1440p
82.6 FPS
w1440p
69.0 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
Ryzen 5 3400G
  • The Ryzen 5 3400G is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3400G has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G specifications

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Architecture

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3400G
CodenameAlder Lake-SPicasso
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Ryzen 5 (Zen+ (Picasso))
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62YD3400
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Cache

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3400G
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Cores

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3400G
# of Cores44
# of Threads88
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Radeon RX Vega 11
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Performance

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3400G
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.2 GHz

i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G Physical

i3-12100 Ryzen 5 3400G
Die Size163 mm²210 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA16AµOPGA-1331
Process Size10 nm12 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM4

Compare i3-12100 vs Ryzen 5 3400G in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments