i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 Athlon II X3 455

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
2768 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
1130 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 455

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
12.9 FPS
1080p
5.9 FPS
1440p
11.3 FPS
1440p
5.2 FPS
2160p
8.9 FPS
2160p
4.1 FPS
w1440p
10.8 FPS
w1440p
5.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
26.9 FPS
1080p
13.5 FPS
1440p
24.0 FPS
1440p
12.0 FPS
2160p
19.4 FPS
2160p
9.7 FPS
w1440p
23.0 FPS
w1440p
11.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
41.0 FPS
1080p
21.0 FPS
1440p
36.6 FPS
1440p
18.9 FPS
2160p
29.9 FPS
2160p
15.4 FPS
w1440p
35.3 FPS
w1440p
18.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.0 FPS
1080p
36.2 FPS
1440p
62.0 FPS
1440p
32.5 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
2160p
26.6 FPS
w1440p
59.7 FPS
w1440p
31.5 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X3 455
  • The Athlon II X3 455 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 specifications

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 Architecture

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 455
CodenameAlder Lake-SRana
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Athlon II X3 (Rana)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL62ADX455WFK32GMADX455WFGMBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 Cache

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 455
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 Cores

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 455
# of Cores43
# of Threads83
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 Performance

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 455
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier33.0x16.5x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 Physical

i3-12100 Athlon II X3 455
Die Size163 mm²169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12100 vs Athlon II X3 455 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments