i3-10100 vs i5-11400 - Microsoft Flight Simulator R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i5-11400

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
14000 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
2700 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i5-11400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
21.3 FPS
1080p
23.0 FPS
1440p
18.7 FPS
1440p
19.3 FPS
2160p
14.8 FPS
2160p
15.3 FPS
w1440p
17.9 FPS
w1440p
18.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
41.8 FPS
1080p
44.7 FPS
1440p
37.3 FPS
1440p
38.3 FPS
2160p
30.4 FPS
2160p
31.3 FPS
w1440p
35.9 FPS
w1440p
37.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
62.3 FPS
1080p
66.4 FPS
1440p
55.9 FPS
1440p
57.4 FPS
2160p
46.0 FPS
2160p
47.3 FPS
w1440p
53.9 FPS
w1440p
55.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
103.3 FPS
1080p
109.8 FPS
1440p
93.1 FPS
1440p
95.5 FPS
2160p
77.2 FPS
2160p
79.3 FPS
w1440p
89.9 FPS
w1440p
92.3 FPS
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-11400
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-11400 specifications

i3-10100 vs i5-11400

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Compatibility

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 General

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Memory Specs

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Performance

i3-10100 i5-11400
Frequency3.60 GHz2.6 GHz
TDP65 W65 W

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Technical Specs

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i5-11400

i3-10100 vs i5-11400 Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i5-11400

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-11400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments