i3-10100 vs i5-10400 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 4080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-10100 i5-10400

Multi-Thread Performance

9549 Pts
12716 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2531 Pts
2609 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 4080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-10100 i5-10400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.5 FPS
1080p
61.5 FPS
1440p
50.5 FPS
1440p
54.1 FPS
2160p
39.8 FPS
2160p
42.6 FPS
w1440p
48.3 FPS
w1440p
51.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.6 FPS
1080p
104.4 FPS
1440p
88.2 FPS
1440p
93.6 FPS
2160p
71.9 FPS
2160p
76.2 FPS
w1440p
84.9 FPS
w1440p
90.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.6 FPS
1080p
147.3 FPS
1440p
125.9 FPS
1440p
133.0 FPS
2160p
104.0 FPS
2160p
109.8 FPS
w1440p
121.5 FPS
w1440p
128.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
221.7 FPS
1080p
233.0 FPS
1440p
201.3 FPS
1440p
211.9 FPS
2160p
168.1 FPS
2160p
177.0 FPS
w1440p
194.7 FPS
w1440p
204.9 FPS
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-10400
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-10400 specifications

i3-10100 vs i5-10400

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Compatibility

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 General

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Integrated Graphics

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Memory Specs

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Performance

i3-10100 i5-10400
Frequency3.60 GHz2.9 GHz
TDP65 W65 W

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Technical Specs

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Technologies and Extensions

i3-10100 i5-10400

i3-10100 vs i5-10400 Virtualization Technologies

i3-10100 i5-10400

Compare i3-10100 vs i5-10400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments