Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300

Multi-Thread Performance

22111 Pts
14493 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2000 Pts
3550 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
21.8 FPS
1080p
24.1 FPS
1440p
19.4 FPS
1440p
21.4 FPS
2160p
15.1 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
18.4 FPS
w1440p
20.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
42.7 FPS
1080p
46.5 FPS
1440p
38.5 FPS
1440p
42.0 FPS
2160p
30.9 FPS
2160p
33.8 FPS
w1440p
36.8 FPS
w1440p
40.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
63.5 FPS
1080p
69.0 FPS
1440p
57.6 FPS
1440p
62.5 FPS
2160p
46.8 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
w1440p
55.2 FPS
w1440p
60.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.2 FPS
1080p
113.9 FPS
1440p
95.9 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
2160p
78.4 FPS
2160p
85.0 FPS
w1440p
91.9 FPS
w1440p
99.8 FPS
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i3-12300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 Architecture

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300
CodenameZenAlder Lake-S
GenerationRyzen Threadripper (Zen)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#YD195XA8UGAAESRL61
Production StatusActiveActive

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 Cache

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300
Cache L196K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L332MB12MB (shared)

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 Cores

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300
# of Cores164
# of Threads328
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 Features

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 Notes

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 Performance

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier34.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP180 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 Physical

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X i3-12300
Die Size213 mm²163 mm²
FoundryGlobalFoundriesIntel
PackageFCLGA-4094FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketAMD Socket SP3r2Intel Socket 1700

Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs i3-12300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments