Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 4050 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

Multi-Thread Performance

22111 Pts
1428 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2000 Pts
796 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 4050 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.9 FPS
1080p
9.4 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
1440p
8.3 FPS
2160p
23.0 FPS
2160p
6.6 FPS
w1440p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
8.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
61.0 FPS
1080p
20.4 FPS
1440p
54.3 FPS
1440p
18.2 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
2160p
14.9 FPS
w1440p
52.5 FPS
w1440p
17.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.1 FPS
1080p
31.3 FPS
1440p
79.9 FPS
1440p
28.2 FPS
2160p
66.4 FPS
2160p
23.2 FPS
w1440p
77.4 FPS
w1440p
27.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
145.2 FPS
1080p
53.3 FPS
1440p
131.0 FPS
1440p
48.1 FPS
2160p
109.8 FPS
2160p
39.7 FPS
w1440p
127.0 FPS
w1440p
46.6 FPS
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
    E2-3200 APU

      Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU specifications

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU Architecture

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU Cache

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU Cores

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU Features

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU Notes

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU Performance

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU Physical

      Ryzen Threadripper 1950X E2-3200 APU

      Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs E2-3200 APU in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments