Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 3050 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F

Multi-Thread Performance

18511 Pts
8988 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1995 Pts
2343 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 3050 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
23.9 FPS
1080p
25.6 FPS
1440p
20.6 FPS
1440p
22.1 FPS
2160p
16.5 FPS
2160p
17.7 FPS
w1440p
19.9 FPS
w1440p
21.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.2 FPS
1080p
49.1 FPS
1440p
40.6 FPS
1440p
43.2 FPS
2160p
33.4 FPS
2160p
35.6 FPS
w1440p
39.4 FPS
w1440p
41.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
68.5 FPS
1080p
72.5 FPS
1440p
60.6 FPS
1440p
64.2 FPS
2160p
50.4 FPS
2160p
53.4 FPS
w1440p
58.9 FPS
w1440p
62.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.1 FPS
1080p
119.4 FPS
1440p
100.6 FPS
1440p
106.3 FPS
2160p
84.2 FPS
2160p
89.1 FPS
w1440p
97.8 FPS
w1440p
103.3 FPS
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
i3-9100F
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-9100F is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F Architecture

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F
CodenameZenCoffee Lake
GenerationRyzen Threadripper (Zen)Core i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#YD192XA8UC9AEunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedAug 2017Apr 2019

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F Cache

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F
Cache L196K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L332MB6MB (shared)

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F Cores

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F
# of Cores124
# of Threads244
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F Features

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F Notes

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F Performance

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier35.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP180 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzup to 4.2 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F Physical

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X i3-9100F
Die Size213 mm²unknown
FoundryGlobalFoundriesIntel
PackageFCLGA-4094FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketAMD Socket SP3r2Intel Socket 1151
Transistors9600 millionunknown
tCaseMaxunknown72°C

Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs i3-9100F in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments