Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 4080 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K

Multi-Thread Performance

15808 Pts
41458 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2047 Pts
5619 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 4080 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.4 FPS
1080p
95.3 FPS
1440p
61.9 FPS
1440p
81.5 FPS
2160p
48.7 FPS
2160p
64.2 FPS
w1440p
59.2 FPS
w1440p
78.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
117.1 FPS
1080p
151.3 FPS
1440p
105.0 FPS
1440p
132.6 FPS
2160p
85.5 FPS
2160p
108.3 FPS
w1440p
101.0 FPS
w1440p
127.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.8 FPS
1080p
207.3 FPS
1440p
148.0 FPS
1440p
183.7 FPS
2160p
122.3 FPS
2160p
152.3 FPS
w1440p
142.9 FPS
w1440p
177.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
257.2 FPS
1080p
319.3 FPS
1440p
234.1 FPS
1440p
285.8 FPS
2160p
195.9 FPS
2160p
240.5 FPS
w1440p
226.5 FPS
w1440p
277.0 FPS
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i9-14900K
  • The i9-14900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-14900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K Architecture

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K
CodenameZenRaptor Lake-R
GenerationRyzen Threadripper (Zen)Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K Cache

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K
Cache L196K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L332MB36 MB (shared)

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K Cores

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K Features

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K Notes

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K Performance

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier38.0x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4 GHzup to 6 GHz

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K Physical

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X i9-14900K
Die Size213 mm²257 mm²
FoundryGlobalFoundriesIntel
PackageFCLGA-4094FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketAMD Socket SP3r2Intel Socket 1700

Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs i9-14900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments