Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 3060 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

Multi-Thread Performance

15808 Pts
1428 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2047 Pts
796 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 3060 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.1 FPS
1080p
10.1 FPS
1440p
26.9 FPS
1440p
9.0 FPS
2160p
21.2 FPS
2160p
7.1 FPS
w1440p
25.7 FPS
w1440p
8.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.5 FPS
1080p
21.7 FPS
1440p
51.2 FPS
1440p
19.6 FPS
2160p
41.6 FPS
2160p
15.9 FPS
w1440p
49.2 FPS
w1440p
18.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.8 FPS
1080p
33.3 FPS
1440p
75.5 FPS
1440p
30.2 FPS
2160p
62.0 FPS
2160p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
72.7 FPS
w1440p
29.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
135.5 FPS
1080p
56.5 FPS
1440p
124.2 FPS
1440p
51.4 FPS
2160p
102.9 FPS
2160p
42.2 FPS
w1440p
119.8 FPS
w1440p
49.5 FPS
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
    E2-3200 APU

      Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU specifications

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU Architecture

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU Cache

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU Cores

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU Features

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU Notes

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU Performance

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU Physical

      Ryzen Threadripper 1900X E2-3200 APU

      Compare Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs E2-3200 APU in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments