Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 4050 - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen 5 5600X Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Multi-Thread Performance

21515 Pts
15808 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3061 Pts
2047 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 4050 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 5600X Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.7 FPS
1080p
31.0 FPS
1440p
33.8 FPS
1440p
27.1 FPS
2160p
27.1 FPS
2160p
21.7 FPS
w1440p
32.6 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.2 FPS
1080p
57.9 FPS
1440p
62.4 FPS
1440p
51.5 FPS
2160p
51.5 FPS
2160p
42.5 FPS
w1440p
60.5 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.6 FPS
1080p
84.8 FPS
1440p
91.0 FPS
1440p
76.0 FPS
2160p
76.0 FPS
2160p
63.3 FPS
w1440p
88.4 FPS
w1440p
73.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
164.5 FPS
1080p
138.7 FPS
1440p
148.3 FPS
1440p
124.9 FPS
2160p
124.9 FPS
2160p
104.8 FPS
w1440p
144.2 FPS
w1440p
121.3 FPS
Ryzen 5 5600X
  • The Ryzen 5 5600X is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 5600X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The Ryzen 5 5600X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X specifications

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Architecture

Ryzen 5 5600X Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
CodenameVermeerZen
GenerationRyzen 5 (Zen 3)Ryzen Threadripper (Zen)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownYD190XA8AEWOFYD190XA8U8SAE
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedNov 5th, 2020Aug 2017

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Cache

Ryzen 5 5600X Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L332MB (shared)32MB

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Cores

Ryzen 5 5600X Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
# of Cores68
# of Threads1216
Integrated GraphicsN/AN/A
SMP # CPUs11

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Performance

Ryzen 5 5600X Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Multiplier37.0x38.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.6 GHzup to 4 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Physical

Ryzen 5 5600X Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Die Sizeunknown213 mm²
FoundryTSMCGlobalFoundries
PackageFCLGA-4094
Process Size7 nm14 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM4AMD Socket SP3r2
Transistors4,800 million9600 million
tCaseMaxunknownunknown

Compare Ryzen 5 5600X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments