Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K - Microsoft Flight Simulator TITAN Xp - Game Performance Benchmarks


Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K

Multi-Thread Performance

12265 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

1821 Pts
4308 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K in Microsoft Flight Simulator using TITAN Xp - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
31.3 FPS
1080p
43.8 FPS
1440p
27.4 FPS
1440p
35.2 FPS
2160p
21.7 FPS
2160p
27.9 FPS
w1440p
26.3 FPS
w1440p
33.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.4 FPS
1080p
78.1 FPS
1440p
52.0 FPS
1440p
64.7 FPS
2160p
42.5 FPS
2160p
52.9 FPS
w1440p
50.2 FPS
w1440p
62.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.5 FPS
1080p
112.3 FPS
1440p
76.7 FPS
1440p
94.1 FPS
2160p
63.3 FPS
2160p
77.8 FPS
w1440p
74.1 FPS
w1440p
91.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.7 FPS
1080p
180.8 FPS
1440p
126.0 FPS
1440p
153.0 FPS
2160p
104.8 FPS
2160p
127.8 FPS
w1440p
122.0 FPS
w1440p
148.3 FPS
Ryzen 5 1600
  • The Ryzen 5 1600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 5 1600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 1600 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-14600K
  • The i5-14600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-14600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K Architecture

Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K
CodenameZenRaptor Lake-R
GenerationRyzen 5 (Zen)Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K Cache

Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K
Cache L196K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)24 MB (shared)

Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K Cores

Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K

Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K Features

Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K

Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K Notes

Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K

Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K Performance

Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier32.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 3.6 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K Physical

Ryzen 5 1600 i5-14600K
Die Size192 mm²257 mm²
FoundryGlobalFoundriesIntel
PackageµPGAFC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM4Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMaxunknown72°C

Compare Ryzen 5 1600 vs i5-14600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments