Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K - Microsoft Flight Simulator GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


Phenom II X3 705e i9-12900K

Multi-Thread Performance

2227 Pts
28791 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

844 Pts
3903 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K in Microsoft Flight Simulator using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

Phenom II X3 705e i9-12900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
4.3 FPS
1080p
14.2 FPS
1440p
3.8 FPS
1440p
12.1 FPS
2160p
3.0 FPS
2160p
9.6 FPS
w1440p
3.6 FPS
w1440p
11.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
10.2 FPS
1080p
29.3 FPS
1440p
9.1 FPS
1440p
25.5 FPS
2160p
7.4 FPS
2160p
20.8 FPS
w1440p
8.7 FPS
w1440p
24.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
16.0 FPS
1080p
44.4 FPS
1440p
14.4 FPS
1440p
38.8 FPS
2160p
11.7 FPS
2160p
31.9 FPS
w1440p
13.7 FPS
w1440p
37.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.7 FPS
1080p
74.6 FPS
1440p
25.0 FPS
1440p
65.5 FPS
2160p
20.4 FPS
2160p
54.2 FPS
w1440p
23.9 FPS
w1440p
63.3 FPS
Phenom II X3 705e
  • The Phenom II X3 705e has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X3 705e is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i9-12900K
  • The i9-12900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-12900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-12900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-12900K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K specifications

Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K Architecture

Phenom II X3 705e i9-12900K
CodenameHekaAlder Lake
GenerationPhenom II X3 (Heka)Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
Part#HD705EOCK3DGIHD705EOCGIBOXunknown
Production StatusEnd-of-lifeActive

Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K Cache

Phenom II X3 705e i9-12900K
Cache L1128K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2512K (per core)14MB (shared)
Cache L36MB (shared)30MB (shared)

Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K Cores

Phenom II X3 705e i9-12900K
# of Cores316
# of Threads324
Integrated GraphicsN/AUHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K Features

Phenom II X3 705e i9-12900K

Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K Performance

Phenom II X3 705e i9-12900K
Base Clock200 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier12.5x32.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5.2 GHz

Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K Physical

Phenom II X3 705e i9-12900K
Die Size258 mm²unknown
PackageµPGAFC-LGA1700
Process Size45 nm10 nm
SocketAMD Socket AM3Intel Socket 1700
Transistors758 millionunknown
tCaseMaxunknown72°C

Compare Phenom II X3 705e vs i9-12900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments