i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X - Hogwarts Legacy GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
23838 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
2917 Pts

Hogwarts Legacy

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X in Hogwarts Legacy using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
24.2 FPS
1080p
23.3 FPS
1440p
18.6 FPS
1440p
17.9 FPS
2160p
13.0 FPS
2160p
12.5 FPS
w1440p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
16.2 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
46.7 FPS
1080p
45.2 FPS
1440p
37.1 FPS
1440p
35.9 FPS
2160p
27.1 FPS
2160p
26.2 FPS
w1440p
34.1 FPS
w1440p
32.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.2 FPS
1080p
67.1 FPS
1440p
55.7 FPS
1440p
53.9 FPS
2160p
41.2 FPS
2160p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
51.4 FPS
w1440p
49.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
114.3 FPS
1080p
110.9 FPS
1440p
92.7 FPS
1440p
89.9 FPS
2160p
69.5 FPS
2160p
67.3 FPS
w1440p
85.9 FPS
w1440p
83.0 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
Ryzen 7 3700X
  • The Ryzen 7 3700X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 7 3700X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen 7 3700X is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 7 3700X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X specifications

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Architecture

i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X
CodenameComet LakeZen 2
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Ryzen 7 (Zen 2)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMay 2020Jul 2019

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Cache

i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)32MB

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Cores

i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X
# of Cores108
# of Threads2016
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Features

i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Notes

i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance

i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier37.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Physical

i9-10900K Ryzen 7 3700X
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelTSMC
PackageFC-LGA1200
Process Size14 nm7 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknown19,200 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i9-10900K vs Ryzen 7 3700X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments