i3-12100 vs i9-10900K - GRID Autosport R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i9-10900K

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
22851 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
3099 Pts

GRID Autosport

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K in GRID Autosport using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i9-10900K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.8 FPS
1080p
87.9 FPS
1440p
82.8 FPS
1440p
84.5 FPS
2160p
55.2 FPS
2160p
56.3 FPS
w1440p
73.8 FPS
w1440p
75.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
135.7 FPS
1080p
141.3 FPS
1440p
134.4 FPS
1440p
136.7 FPS
2160p
95.2 FPS
2160p
96.8 FPS
w1440p
121.9 FPS
w1440p
124.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
187.7 FPS
1080p
194.8 FPS
1440p
185.9 FPS
1440p
188.9 FPS
2160p
135.2 FPS
2160p
137.3 FPS
w1440p
170.0 FPS
w1440p
172.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
291.6 FPS
1080p
301.6 FPS
1440p
289.1 FPS
1440p
293.3 FPS
2160p
215.1 FPS
2160p
218.3 FPS
w1440p
266.2 FPS
w1440p
270.0 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12100 vs i9-10900K specifications

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Architecture

i3-12100 i9-10900K
CodenameAlder Lake-SComet Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i9 (Comet Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Cache

i3-12100 i9-10900K
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)16MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Cores

i3-12100 i9-10900K
# of Cores410
# of Threads820
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Performance

i3-12100 i9-10900K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 5.3 GHz

i3-12100 vs i9-10900K Physical

i3-12100 i9-10900K
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1200
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1200

Compare i3-12100 vs i9-10900K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments