i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - GRID Autosport R9 290X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

GRID Autosport

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in GRID Autosport using R9 290X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
75.9 FPS
1080p
74.1 FPS
1440p
72.5 FPS
1440p
71.7 FPS
2160p
45.1 FPS
2160p
44.6 FPS
w1440p
62.9 FPS
w1440p
62.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
124.8 FPS
1080p
122.3 FPS
1440p
120.1 FPS
1440p
118.9 FPS
2160p
80.0 FPS
2160p
79.3 FPS
w1440p
106.4 FPS
w1440p
105.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
173.7 FPS
1080p
170.5 FPS
1440p
167.6 FPS
1440p
166.2 FPS
2160p
115.0 FPS
2160p
114.0 FPS
w1440p
149.9 FPS
w1440p
148.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
271.6 FPS
1080p
266.9 FPS
1440p
262.8 FPS
1440p
260.6 FPS
2160p
184.9 FPS
2160p
183.3 FPS
w1440p
236.9 FPS
w1440p
235.2 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments