i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF - GRID 2 R9 290X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-11700K i5-9600KF

Multi-Thread Performance

19864 Pts
13507 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3140 Pts
2735 Pts

GRID 2

i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF in GRID 2 using R9 290X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-11700K i5-9600KF

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.2 FPS
1080p
132.5 FPS
1440p
93.7 FPS
1440p
91.7 FPS
2160p
55.3 FPS
2160p
54.1 FPS
w1440p
79.7 FPS
w1440p
78.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
207.8 FPS
1080p
199.5 FPS
1440p
149.2 FPS
1440p
146.5 FPS
2160p
95.3 FPS
2160p
93.6 FPS
w1440p
130.1 FPS
w1440p
127.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
276.4 FPS
1080p
266.4 FPS
1440p
204.6 FPS
1440p
201.2 FPS
2160p
135.3 FPS
2160p
133.0 FPS
w1440p
180.5 FPS
w1440p
177.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
413.7 FPS
1080p
400.3 FPS
1440p
315.5 FPS
1440p
310.8 FPS
2160p
215.4 FPS
2160p
211.9 FPS
w1440p
281.3 FPS
w1440p
277.0 FPS
i7-11700K
  • The i7-11700K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i7-11700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-11700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-11700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i7-11700K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-9600KF
  • The i5-9600KF is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-9600KF has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF specifications

i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF Architecture

i7-11700K i5-9600KF
CodenameRocket LakeCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i7 (Rocket Lake-S) Core i5 (Coffee Lake Refresh)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#unknownBX80684I59600KFBXC80684I5960KFSRFAD
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedMar 16th, 2021Jan 2019

i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF Cache

i7-11700K i5-9600KF
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)9MB (shared)

i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF Cores

i7-11700K i5-9600KF
# of Cores86
# of Threads166
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF Features

i7-11700K i5-9600KF

i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF Notes

i7-11700K i5-9600KF

i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF Performance

i7-11700K i5-9600KF
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier36.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesYes
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5 GHzup to 4.6 GHz
Voltagevariablevariable

i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF Physical

i7-11700K i5-9600KF
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1151
Process Size14 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1151
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i7-11700K vs i5-9600KF in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments