i3-8300 vs i3-10300 - GRID 2 R9 290X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-8300 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

8715 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2172 Pts
2690 Pts

GRID 2

i3-8300 vs i3-10300 in GRID 2 using R9 290X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-8300 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
120.9 FPS
1080p
128.4 FPS
1440p
88.1 FPS
1440p
90.4 FPS
2160p
52.0 FPS
2160p
53.4 FPS
w1440p
75.0 FPS
w1440p
76.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
184.8 FPS
1080p
194.3 FPS
1440p
141.6 FPS
1440p
144.7 FPS
2160p
90.4 FPS
2160p
92.5 FPS
w1440p
123.6 FPS
w1440p
126.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
248.6 FPS
1080p
260.2 FPS
1440p
195.1 FPS
1440p
199.0 FPS
2160p
128.9 FPS
2160p
131.6 FPS
w1440p
172.1 FPS
w1440p
175.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
376.3 FPS
1080p
392.0 FPS
1440p
302.1 FPS
1440p
307.7 FPS
2160p
205.7 FPS
2160p
209.9 FPS
w1440p
269.3 FPS
w1440p
274.2 FPS
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300

    Compare i3-8300 vs i3-10300 specifications

    i3-8300 vs i3-10300 Architecture

    i3-8300 i3-10300

    i3-8300 vs i3-10300 Cache

    i3-8300 i3-10300

    i3-8300 vs i3-10300 Cores

    i3-8300 i3-10300

    i3-8300 vs i3-10300 Features

    i3-8300 i3-10300

    i3-8300 vs i3-10300 Performance

    i3-8300 i3-10300
    Frequency3.7 GHz3.70 GHz
    TDP62 W65 W

    i3-8300 vs i3-10300 Physical

    i3-8300 i3-10300

    Compare i3-8300 vs i3-10300 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments