i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 - GreedFall GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-13700K Athlon II X4 620

Multi-Thread Performance

28603 Pts
2938 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4521 Pts
906 Pts

GreedFall

i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 in GreedFall using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-13700K Athlon II X4 620

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
52.9 FPS
1080p
18.6 FPS
1440p
36.3 FPS
1440p
13.3 FPS
2160p
15.1 FPS
2160p
5.6 FPS
w1440p
27.5 FPS
w1440p
10.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
91.8 FPS
1080p
37.1 FPS
1440p
66.4 FPS
1440p
27.7 FPS
2160p
30.9 FPS
2160p
12.9 FPS
w1440p
52.2 FPS
w1440p
21.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
130.6 FPS
1080p
55.7 FPS
1440p
96.5 FPS
1440p
42.0 FPS
2160p
46.8 FPS
2160p
20.1 FPS
w1440p
76.9 FPS
w1440p
33.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
208.4 FPS
1080p
92.7 FPS
1440p
156.7 FPS
1440p
70.8 FPS
2160p
78.4 FPS
2160p
34.6 FPS
w1440p
126.3 FPS
w1440p
56.5 FPS
i7-13700K
  • The i7-13700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-13700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i7-13700K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Athlon II X4 620
  • The Athlon II X4 620 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Athlon II X4 620 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 specifications

i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 Architecture

i7-13700K Athlon II X4 620
CodenameRaptor Lake-SPropus
GenerationCore i7 (Raptor Lake)Athlon II X4 (Propus)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRMB8ADX620WFK42GIADX620WFGIBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 Cache

i7-13700K Athlon II X4 620
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L22MB (per core)512K (per core)

i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 Cores

i7-13700K Athlon II X4 620
# of Cores164
# of Threads244
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 770N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 Performance

i7-13700K Athlon II X4 620
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier34.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.4 GHzN/A

i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 Physical

i7-13700K Athlon II X4 620
Die Size257 mm²169 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i7-13700K vs Athlon II X4 620 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments