i9-10900K vs i5-12400 - Godfall RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
3240 Pts

Godfall

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 in Godfall using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
114.4 FPS
1080p
112.9 FPS
1440p
76.5 FPS
1440p
75.5 FPS
2160p
38.6 FPS
2160p
38.1 FPS
w1440p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
60.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
176.4 FPS
1080p
174.5 FPS
1440p
125.7 FPS
1440p
124.3 FPS
2160p
70.0 FPS
2160p
69.2 FPS
w1440p
104.5 FPS
w1440p
103.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
238.4 FPS
1080p
236.0 FPS
1440p
174.8 FPS
1440p
173.0 FPS
2160p
101.4 FPS
2160p
100.3 FPS
w1440p
147.4 FPS
w1440p
145.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
362.4 FPS
1080p
359.2 FPS
1440p
273.1 FPS
1440p
270.6 FPS
2160p
164.2 FPS
2160p
162.6 FPS
w1440p
233.3 FPS
w1440p
231.1 FPS
i9-10900K
  • The i9-10900K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i9-10900K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i9-10900K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i9-10900K has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-12400 specifications

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Architecture

i9-10900K i5-12400
CodenameComet LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i9 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Cache

i9-10900K i5-12400
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L316MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Cores

i9-10900K i5-12400
# of Cores106
# of Threads2012
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Features

i9-10900K i5-12400

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Notes

i9-10900K i5-12400

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Performance

i9-10900K i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier37.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedYesNo
TDP125 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 5.3 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i9-10900K vs i5-12400 Physical

i9-10900K i5-12400
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700

Compare i9-10900K vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments