i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 - Godfall Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 Core2 Duo E6420

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
1361 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
807 Pts

Godfall

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 in Godfall using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E6420

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.0 FPS
1080p
14.4 FPS
1440p
31.6 FPS
1440p
9.7 FPS
2160p
14.6 FPS
2160p
4.5 FPS
w1440p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
7.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.9 FPS
1080p
29.7 FPS
1440p
58.9 FPS
1440p
20.9 FPS
2160p
30.0 FPS
2160p
10.6 FPS
w1440p
47.6 FPS
w1440p
16.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.9 FPS
1080p
44.9 FPS
1440p
86.2 FPS
1440p
32.2 FPS
2160p
45.5 FPS
2160p
16.7 FPS
w1440p
70.4 FPS
w1440p
26.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
190.7 FPS
1080p
75.5 FPS
1440p
140.8 FPS
1440p
54.7 FPS
2160p
76.3 FPS
2160p
28.8 FPS
w1440p
116.1 FPS
w1440p
44.7 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Core2 Duo E6420
  • The Core2 Duo E6420 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM

Compare i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 specifications

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Architecture

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E6420
CodenameAlder Lake-SConroe
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core 2 Duo (Conroe)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Part#SRL4V SRL5YSLA4T
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Cache

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E6420
Cache L180K (per core)64K
Cache L21.25MB (per core)4MB

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Cores

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E6420
# of Cores62
# of Threads122
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Performance

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E6420
Base Clock100 MHz266 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz2.133 GHz
Multiplier25.0x8.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 Physical

i5-12400 Core2 Duo E6420
Die Size163 mm²111 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA6
Process Size10 nm65 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 775

Compare i5-12400 vs Core2 Duo E6420 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments