i5-12400 vs i3-7320 - Godfall Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-12400 i3-7320

Multi-Thread Performance

16800 Pts
6541 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3240 Pts
2364 Pts

Godfall

i5-12400 vs i3-7320 in Godfall using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-12400 i3-7320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
47.0 FPS
1080p
36.3 FPS
1440p
31.6 FPS
1440p
24.4 FPS
2160p
14.6 FPS
2160p
11.3 FPS
w1440p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
19.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.9 FPS
1080p
66.4 FPS
1440p
58.9 FPS
1440p
47.1 FPS
2160p
30.0 FPS
2160p
24.0 FPS
w1440p
47.6 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.9 FPS
1080p
96.5 FPS
1440p
86.2 FPS
1440p
69.7 FPS
2160p
45.5 FPS
2160p
36.6 FPS
w1440p
70.4 FPS
w1440p
56.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
190.7 FPS
1080p
156.7 FPS
1440p
140.8 FPS
1440p
115.0 FPS
2160p
76.3 FPS
2160p
62.0 FPS
w1440p
116.1 FPS
w1440p
94.7 FPS
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12400 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-12400 vs i3-7320 specifications

i5-12400 vs i3-7320 Architecture

i5-12400 i3-7320
CodenameAlder Lake-SKaby Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL4V SRL5YSR358
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-12400 vs i3-7320 Cache

i5-12400 i3-7320
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L318MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i5-12400 vs i3-7320 Cores

i5-12400 i3-7320
# of Cores62
# of Threads124
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i5-12400 vs i3-7320 Performance

i5-12400 i3-7320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier25.0x41.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP65 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i5-12400 vs i3-7320 Physical

i5-12400 i3-7320
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i5-12400 vs i3-7320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments