i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - Godfall RTX 3060 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-4340 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Multi-Thread Performance

5237 Pts
18511 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2085 Pts
1995 Pts

Godfall

i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in Godfall using RTX 3060 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-4340 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
60.7 FPS
1080p
92.4 FPS
1440p
40.1 FPS
1440p
61.0 FPS
2160p
19.0 FPS
2160p
28.9 FPS
w1440p
31.6 FPS
w1440p
48.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
103.2 FPS
1080p
147.4 FPS
1440p
72.3 FPS
1440p
103.7 FPS
2160p
37.8 FPS
2160p
54.5 FPS
w1440p
58.9 FPS
w1440p
84.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
145.7 FPS
1080p
202.4 FPS
1440p
104.6 FPS
1440p
146.3 FPS
2160p
56.7 FPS
2160p
80.1 FPS
w1440p
86.2 FPS
w1440p
121.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
230.8 FPS
1080p
312.5 FPS
1440p
169.1 FPS
1440p
231.6 FPS
2160p
94.3 FPS
2160p
131.3 FPS
w1440p
140.8 FPS
w1440p
194.1 FPS
i3-4340
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-4340 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
  • The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X specifications

i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Architecture

i3-4340 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
CodenameHaswellZen
GenerationCore i3 (Haswell)Ryzen Threadripper (Zen)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR4
Part#SR1NLYD192XA8UC9AE
Production StatusunknownActive
ReleasedSep 2013Aug 2017

i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Cache

i3-4340 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)32MB

i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Cores

i3-4340 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
# of Cores212
# of Threads424
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 4600N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Features

i3-4340 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4A SSE4.1 SSE4.2 AES AVX AVX2 BMI1 BMI2 SHA F16C FMA3 AMD64 EVP AMD-V SMAP SMEP SMT Precision Boost XFR

i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Performance

i3-4340 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier36.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP54 W180 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.2 GHz
Voltageunknownvariable

i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Physical

i3-4340 Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Die Size177 mm²213 mm²
FoundryIntelGlobalFoundries
PackageFC-LGA12CFCLGA-4094
Process Size22 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1150AMD Socket SP3r2
Transistors1400 million9600 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-4340 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
K
kosherfinnegan 12 years ago
Is core i3-4340 good for gaming?On slight budgetOr will the lack of cores not make it worth it?Other components are gtx 650ti boost8gb ddr3cx 430w psu
0 0
N
nervousmute 12 years ago
AMD FX CPUs are power hungry. I believe even the 6 core FX-6300 consumes 100w more power than Intel's Core i3. Therefore, if you want to go with AMD then you need a more powerful PSU. I would not even attempt to put a FX-8xxx CPU in a mATX case. Too much heat and you don't really need 8 cores. The motherboard you select only has a 760G chipset so you will not be able to upgrade to Steamroller which needs a 9xx series chipset. Games using only 1 or 2 cores will run better with the Core i3, but games that can take advantage of more than 2 cores will generally run better with FX CPU.Crysis 3 is an extreme case where a Core i3 performs poorly. Any other games using the CryEngine 3 game engine will likely not set the CPU demands as high as Crysis 3. The higher the requirements the fewer copies the publisher will sell. Unless Crysis 3 is on your list, the Core i3 is still a viable CPU and you can upgrade to a Core i5 CPU later. If you don't want to bother with upgrades in the future, then just go with a FX-6xxx CPU.You can check out CPU benchmarks in several games from the following website to help you determine which CPU to go for. Simply click, then scroll down to the Gaming GPU/CPU Performance section for several games benchmarked. Then look for the CPU Performance benchmark in each game.http://www.techspot.com/guides-gaming.shtmlARMA 3 is the most recent review. Here's a link and the benchmark chart.http://www.techspot.com/review/712-arma-3-benchmarks/page5.html
0 0
S
springsrock 11 years ago
i5 4440 or i3 4340 or i3 4130 for gaming ?I am building a low budget gaming pc.I will be buying the gtx 750ti for the gpu.For the CPU I have mentioned the options.which one is goint to be the best ! Please help me I am very confused. My rig: Mobo - Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV Ram - Corsair Vengeance 1x8gb 1600mhz DDR3PSU - Cooler Master Thunder 450P.S I have planned to buy all these
0 0
R
retractunderwear 11 years ago
I would also go with the i5 as it will be good for cpu intensive games. I don't know the performance difference but you could look at that online for benchmarks
0 0
B
balearicventricle 12 years ago
what do you think about i3 4340I am building a budget gaming computer and wondered what the community thought of this chip
0 0
P
pickwickwidespread 12 years ago
Also, i3s are GREAT chips and are all MOST people need.My little bro still has a i3 2120 pushing his GTX 660 ti and he maxes out most games on a pretty nice 1080p monitor. There is absolutely NO need for him to upgrade anytime soon.
0 0
S
sunnycomma 12 years ago
Intel Core i3 4340 Bottleneck the amd 280xHello, I am building a computer for my friend and I am stuck between the amd 6300 and intel core i3 4340. I was wondering if the i3 would bottleneck the amd r9 280x. If anyone could tell me how to find out if a cpu will bottleneck a gpu would be greatly appreciated.
0 0
A
acutenesspace 12 years ago
I think the i3 4340 would be fine. It has some seriously powerful single thread performance. We know the FX 6300 works well, but the FX 8320 is about the same price as the i3 4340. i3s are no slouches in games. Especially on a single 1080p monitor. Of course an i5 would be better......It's all about the budget.
0 0
W
walruschokehold 9 years ago
Overclocking i3 4340 lock haswell 3.6ghz to 3.7I have seen a guys cpu-z screenshot where his 4340 was running at 3.7 and he had mentioned something about BCLK/straps 100mhzDoes anyone know how to do this and is it limited by motherboard?
0 0
C
colagyr 9 years ago
It is limited by the motherboard.I wouldn;'t mess with that unless you really know what you are doing(and you don;t if you ask this).While on SKylake BCLK OCing is ok, with Haswell it's a totally differt beast. In simple terms, on Haswell, when you increase the BCLK you're overclocking everything, not just the CPU. There are ways to ammend this, but, if you want to get into it, you're in for a steep learning curve.
0 0