i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T - Godfall Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-4330 Phenom II X6 1035T

Multi-Thread Performance

5092 Pts
4665 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2031 Pts
1014 Pts

Godfall

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T in Godfall using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-4330 Phenom II X6 1035T

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
25.2 FPS
1080p
20.7 FPS
1440p
16.9 FPS
1440p
13.9 FPS
2160p
7.8 FPS
2160p
6.4 FPS
w1440p
13.2 FPS
w1440p
10.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.4 FPS
1080p
40.8 FPS
1440p
34.1 FPS
1440p
28.8 FPS
2160p
17.3 FPS
2160p
14.5 FPS
w1440p
27.5 FPS
w1440p
23.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
71.6 FPS
1080p
60.8 FPS
1440p
51.4 FPS
1440p
43.6 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
2160p
22.6 FPS
w1440p
41.8 FPS
w1440p
35.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
118.0 FPS
1080p
101.0 FPS
1440p
85.9 FPS
1440p
73.3 FPS
2160p
45.7 FPS
2160p
38.7 FPS
w1440p
70.3 FPS
w1440p
60.2 FPS
i3-4330
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-4330 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-4330 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X6 1035T
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Phenom II X6 1035T has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T specifications

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Architecture

i3-4330 Phenom II X6 1035T
CodenameHaswellThuban
GenerationCore i3 (Haswell)Phenom II X6 (Thuban)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR3DDR3
Part#SR1NMHDT35TWFK6DGRHDT35TWFGRBOX
Production StatusunknownEnd-of-life
ReleasedSep 2013Apr 2010

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Cache

i3-4330 Phenom II X6 1035T
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Cores

i3-4330 Phenom II X6 1035T
# of Cores26
# of Threads46
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 4600N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Features

i3-4330 Phenom II X6 1035T
MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.2 AVX AVX2 EIST Intel 64 XD bit VT-x HTT AES-NI TSX CLMUL FMA3MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4A AMD64 NX bit AMD-V Turbo Core

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Performance

i3-4330 Phenom II X6 1035T
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplier35.0x13.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP54 W95 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 3.1 GHz
Voltageunknown1.425 V

i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Physical

i3-4330 Phenom II X6 1035T
Die Size177 mm²346 mm²
PackageFC-LGA12CµPGA
Process Size22 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1150AMD Socket AM3
Transistors1400 million904 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-4330 vs Phenom II X6 1035T in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments
A
arguefoxpro 12 years ago
Intel Pentium G3430 or i3-4330?The computer will be for my parents for general/office use (nothing heavy like gaming, CAD work, etc.). And I know for a fact that whatever I build now, they'll be using it until it runs into the ground, so one of my biggest priorities is finding something that will stay relevant for up to 8 years.I've considered a lot of AMD's offerings, but I'm still leaning slightly towards Intel, which seems more suitable, especially because they run a lot of programs that are single-threaded, like MS Word or Excel. Another big thing about Intel that I like is they have integrated graphics that supports 2-3 independent displays, so I don't have to buy a video card to do a dual monitor setup.Anyway, the problem is, I've noticed that even basic tasks like browsing or watching HD videos on YouTube get pretty power hungry over the years. Given this, do you think a Pentium would still suffice or would an i3 have better staying power? At this point, I'm torn between an i3-4330 and a Pentium G3430.Thanks a lot!
0 0
W
walruschokehold 12 years ago
The two main difference between them is the G3430 lacks Hyper Threading. For most people the only apps that they use which can take advantage of HT is compression programs like 7-zip and WinRAR. The other thing that's different is the integrated graphics. The G3430 only has a Haswell generation Intel HD graphics core (no model #) while the i3-4330 has the Intel HD 4600. The Intel HD graphics core is more than enough to playback 1080p videos. Not sure if it's enough for 4k video though. Unless your parents are highly anticipating the release of 4k videos to be viewed on what I assume will be a 1980x1080 monitor, then there's no point in getting the Pentium G3430 since I am not sure if it can support 4k video. Then again, there is no sense in watching 4k video on a 1080p monitor.4k actually refers to several different resolutions, but for HDTV format it refers to 3840×2160 resolution; or "2160p".
0 0
S
spraychicago 11 years ago
i3 4330 bottleneckSo i am running crysis 3 on my system now and im getting about 20-30 fps in welcome to the jungle chapter is that normal with my graphics card? Is it really my cpu the problem?cpu: i3 4330 3.5 ghzGpu: asus strix gtx 970 4gb
0 0
F
frostinggambler 11 years ago
The i3 is likely to be the limiting factor in your setup. The GTX 970 can push Crysis 3 to about 80+ fps with a good rig. An i5 or i7 would see a big jump in performance.In other games you may not see much of a difference, however the Crysis games are generally very hard on all parts of your hardware, and your weakest piece will hold you back, which in your case is the i3.
0 0
M
molecularsuffering 11 years ago
i3-4150 vs. i3-4330These two are the same price on Amazon, but what the actual differences? Are there any?
0 0
R
rubbishlibrary 11 years ago
Get the i3 4330 it is a little bit better. http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i3-4330-vs-Intel-Core-i3-4150
0 0
D
dubbedshear 11 years ago
i3 4330 bottleneckWill my i3 4330 bottleneck a lot a gtx 970? Cause im on a tight budget and i cant afford a i5 right now..
0 0
C
cocoillegal 11 years ago
Since your on a tight budget just go with the gtx 970.. it will bottleneck on those more cpu hungry games, but in the future u should update it to a i5 or better
0 0
V
venussardine 11 years ago
i3-4330 + GTX 760 Bottlenecks?I have recently purchased a Gigabyte WindforceX3 2GB GTX 760 and I was wondering if my pairing it with the i3-4330 in my current system would cause any bottlenecks.
0 0
C
crispclad 11 years ago
I think you are appropriate and good.Try it with YOUR games and see.If you want to experiment a bit and find out what is the weak part,do a bit of testing.a) Run your games, but lower your resolution and eye candy. If your FPS increases, it indicates that your cpu is strong enough to drive a better graphics configuration.If your FPS stays the same, you are likely more cpu limited.b) Limit your cpu, either by reducing the OC, or, in windows power management, limit the maximum cpu% to something like 70%.Go to control panel/power options/change plan settings/change advanced power settings/processor power management/maximum processor state/ This will simulate what a lack of cpu power will do. Conversely what a 30% improvement in core speed might do.It is possible that both tests are positive, indicating that you have a well balanced system, and both cpu and gpu need to be upgraded to get better gaming FPS.
0 0