i3-12300 vs i7-13700K - Godfall GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i7-13700K

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
28603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
4521 Pts

Godfall

i3-12300 vs i7-13700K in Godfall using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i7-13700K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.4 FPS
1080p
43.0 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
1440p
27.6 FPS
2160p
12.2 FPS
2160p
13.1 FPS
w1440p
20.2 FPS
w1440p
21.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.7 FPS
1080p
76.8 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
1440p
52.4 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
2160p
27.3 FPS
w1440p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
42.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.0 FPS
1080p
110.7 FPS
1440p
72.5 FPS
1440p
77.1 FPS
2160p
39.1 FPS
2160p
41.5 FPS
w1440p
59.6 FPS
w1440p
63.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.6 FPS
1080p
178.3 FPS
1440p
119.4 FPS
1440p
126.7 FPS
2160p
66.0 FPS
2160p
69.9 FPS
w1440p
99.0 FPS
w1440p
105.2 FPS
i3-12300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i7-13700K
  • The i7-13700K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i7-13700K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i7-13700K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i7-13700K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i3-12300 vs i7-13700K specifications

i3-12300 vs i7-13700K Architecture

i3-12300 i7-13700K
ChipsetsZ690, H670, B660, H610Z690, Z790
CodenameAlder Lake-SRaptor Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed4800 MT/s5600 MT/s
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i7 (Raptor Lake)
Launch MSRP$143$409
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Part#SRL61SRMB8
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 2022Sep 27th, 2022

i3-12300 vs i7-13700K Cache

i3-12300 i7-13700K
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)30MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i7-13700K Cores

i3-12300 i7-13700K
# of Cores416
# of Threads824
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i7-13700K Performance

i3-12300 i7-13700K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier35.0x34.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
PL160W253 W
PL289W253 W
PL2 Tau Limit28 secondsUnlimited
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.4 GHz

i3-12300 vs i7-13700K Physical

i3-12300 i7-13700K
Die Size163 mm²257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i3-12300 vs i7-13700K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments