i3-12300 vs i5-13600K - Godfall RTX 3080 Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i5-13600K

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
4308 Pts

Godfall

i3-12300 vs i5-13600K in Godfall using RTX 3080 Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i5-13600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
133.6 FPS
1080p
148.8 FPS
1440p
89.4 FPS
1440p
95.8 FPS
2160p
42.6 FPS
2160p
45.7 FPS
w1440p
70.6 FPS
w1440p
75.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
200.8 FPS
1080p
219.7 FPS
1440p
143.4 FPS
1440p
152.0 FPS
2160p
76.2 FPS
2160p
81.0 FPS
w1440p
117.4 FPS
w1440p
124.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
268.1 FPS
1080p
290.5 FPS
1440p
197.3 FPS
1440p
208.1 FPS
2160p
109.8 FPS
2160p
116.2 FPS
w1440p
164.2 FPS
w1440p
173.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
402.5 FPS
1080p
432.3 FPS
1440p
305.3 FPS
1440p
320.5 FPS
2160p
177.0 FPS
2160p
186.7 FPS
w1440p
257.7 FPS
w1440p
271.1 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-13600K
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-13600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-13600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-13600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-13600K specifications

i3-12300 vs i5-13600K Architecture

i3-12300 i5-13600K
ChipsetsZ690, H670, B660, H610Z690, Z790
CodenameAlder Lake-SRaptor Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed4800 MT/s5600 MT/s
ECC MemoryNoYes
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Raptor Lake)
Launch MSRP$143$319
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Part#SRL61SRMBD
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 2022Sep 27th, 2022

i3-12300 vs i5-13600K Cache

i3-12300 i5-13600K
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)2MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)24MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i5-13600K Cores

i3-12300 i5-13600K
# of Cores414
# of Threads820
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i5-13600K Performance

i3-12300 i5-13600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier35.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
PL160W181 W
PL289W181 W
PL2 Tau Limit28 secondsUnlimited
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 5.1 GHz

i3-12300 vs i5-13600K Physical

i3-12300 i5-13600K
Die Size163 mm²257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-13600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments