i3-12300 vs i5-12400 - Godfall GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i5-12400

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
16800 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
3240 Pts

Godfall

i3-12300 vs i5-12400 in Godfall using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i5-12400

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.4 FPS
1080p
39.6 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
1440p
26.5 FPS
2160p
12.2 FPS
2160p
12.5 FPS
w1440p
20.2 FPS
w1440p
20.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.7 FPS
1080p
71.6 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
1440p
50.6 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
2160p
26.2 FPS
w1440p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
41.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.0 FPS
1080p
103.5 FPS
1440p
72.5 FPS
1440p
74.6 FPS
2160p
39.1 FPS
2160p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
59.6 FPS
w1440p
61.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.6 FPS
1080p
167.5 FPS
1440p
119.4 FPS
1440p
122.7 FPS
2160p
66.0 FPS
2160p
67.3 FPS
w1440p
99.0 FPS
w1440p
101.7 FPS
i3-12300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-12400
  • The i5-12400 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12400 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12400 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-12400 specifications

i3-12300 vs i5-12400 Architecture

i3-12300 i5-12400
ChipsetsZ690, H670, B660, H610Z690, H670, B660, H610
CodenameAlder Lake-SAlder Lake-S
DDR4 Speed3200 MT/s3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed4800 MT/s4800 MT/s
ECC MemoryNoNo
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
Launch MSRP$143$199
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
PCI-ExpressGen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only)
Part#SRL61SRL4V SRL5Y
Production StatusActiveActive
Release DateJan 2022Jan 4th, 2022

i3-12300 vs i5-12400 Cache

i3-12300 i5-12400
Cache L180K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)18MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i5-12400 Cores

i3-12300 i5-12400
# of Cores46
# of Threads812
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i5-12400 Performance

i3-12300 i5-12400
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier35.0x25.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
PL160W65W
PL289W117W
PL2 Tau Limit28 seconds28 seconds
TDP60 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.4 GHz

i3-12300 vs i5-12400 Physical

i3-12300 i5-12400
Die Size163 mm²163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA16A
Process Size10 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1700
tJMax100°C100°C

Compare i3-12300 vs i5-12400 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments