i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Godfall GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Godfall

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Godfall using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.4 FPS
1080p
36.2 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
1440p
24.2 FPS
2160p
12.2 FPS
2160p
11.5 FPS
w1440p
20.2 FPS
w1440p
19.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.7 FPS
1080p
66.2 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
1440p
46.7 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
2160p
24.3 FPS
w1440p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.0 FPS
1080p
96.3 FPS
1440p
72.5 FPS
1440p
69.2 FPS
2160p
39.1 FPS
2160p
37.2 FPS
w1440p
59.6 FPS
w1440p
56.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.6 FPS
1080p
156.3 FPS
1440p
119.4 FPS
1440p
114.3 FPS
2160p
66.0 FPS
2160p
62.9 FPS
w1440p
99.0 FPS
w1440p
94.7 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments