i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T - Godfall GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1075T

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
5344 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
1193 Pts

Godfall

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T in Godfall using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1075T

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.4 FPS
1080p
19.6 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
1440p
13.1 FPS
2160p
12.2 FPS
2160p
6.2 FPS
w1440p
20.2 FPS
w1440p
10.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.7 FPS
1080p
38.9 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
1440p
27.3 FPS
2160p
25.6 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
39.9 FPS
w1440p
22.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.0 FPS
1080p
58.1 FPS
1440p
72.5 FPS
1440p
41.5 FPS
2160p
39.1 FPS
2160p
22.0 FPS
w1440p
59.6 FPS
w1440p
33.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.6 FPS
1080p
96.7 FPS
1440p
119.4 FPS
1440p
69.9 FPS
2160p
66.0 FPS
2160p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
99.0 FPS
w1440p
57.4 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X6 1075T
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Phenom II X6 1075T has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T specifications

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T Architecture

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1075T
CodenameAlder Lake-SThuban
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Phenom II X6 (Thuban)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61HDT75TFBK6DGRHDT75TFBGRBOX
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T Cache

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1075T
Cache L180K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T Cores

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1075T
# of Cores46
# of Threads86
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T Performance

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1075T
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier35.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 3.5 GHz

i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T Physical

i3-12300 Phenom II X6 1075T
Die Size163 mm²346 mm²
PackageFC-LGA16AµPGA
Process Size10 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700AMD Socket AM3

Compare i3-12300 vs Phenom II X6 1075T in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments